Volume 16. Editorial Introductions to ijCSCL
This book collects the thirty-nine editorial introductions written for each issue of the International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaboraative Learning (ijCSCL) across its first decade of publication, from 2006 to 2016. Read together, they constitute a sustained record of a research field thinking publicly about itself—tracking its growth, debating its theoretical foundations, and advocating for its social vision.
Several thematic threads run through the decade. The most persistent is the question of units of analysis: what is the appropriate level at which to study, support, and measure collaborative learning? The early editorials introduce the individual-group-community trichotomy; the middle-decade editorials (chapters 27–30) make the connections among these levels the central theoretical challenge, proposing interactional resources as bridges between the planes; and the later editorials (chapters 35–39) revisit the question from the perspectives of artifact formation, dialogic theory, and the concept of the intersubjective group.
A second major thread is the field's relationship to theory. Chapters 7 and 19 set up the dialectic between flash-theme empiricism and folk-theory naivety on one side, and theoretically self-conscious CSCL-specific inquiry on the other. Chapters 24, 25, and 33 make the most ambitious theoretical arguments—for ethnomethodologically informed analysis, for dialectical theories of cognizing-mediating artifacts, and for the dialogical foundations of the field in Vygotsky and Bakhtin—while chapter 15 identifies four competing paradigms of shared knowledge that implicitly organize the entire field.
A third thread is internationalization. The editorials document the journal's growth from a North American and European venture into a genuinely global community, with particular attention to the rise of Asian CSCL research (chapters 20, 22, 26). Chapters 21 and 26 celebrate theoretical pluralism and geographic reach as mutually reinforcing values, while the institutional milestones of ISI indexing (chapters 16 and 26) confirm the field's academic standing worldwide.
Running beneath all these threads is the editors' conviction that the journal is itself a CSCL artifact—a knowledge-building medium in which the research community practices the collaborative meaning making it studies.
* Download PDF free for reading online or printing: ijcscl.pdf
(This is the best version: up-to-date, complete, full color, hi-res.)
* Download iBook version free for iPad, Mac, etc.: ijcscl.epub
* Download MOBI version free for Kindle: ijcscl.mobi
* Order paperback from Lulu at printing cost: Lulu page for Gerry Stahl
* Order paperback from Amazon at printing cost: Amazon page for Gerry Stahl
1(1): ijCSCL – a journal for research in CSCL
This inaugural editorial announces the launch of ijCSCL as a mark of academic maturity for the CSCL research community. It situates the journal within the field's history—from the 1989 Maratea workshop where the term CSCL was coined, through the biannual conference series begun in 1995— and describes the new journal as an archival knowledge-building medium for an increasingly global, interdisciplinary community. The editorial surveys four paradigms of educational computing (computer-assisted instruction, intelligent tutoring systems, Logo programming, CSCL) and lays out the journal's commitment to advancing theory, methodology, technology, and pedagogy while serving as a communication vehicle sponsored by the International Society of the Learning Sciences (ISLS).
1(2): Building knowledge in the classroom, building knowledge in the CSCL community
This editorial frames ijCSCL as serving two intertwined missions: advancing classroom collaborative learning and building the CSCL research community itself. It describes the journal's open-access policy, its CrossRef electronic versioning, and its role at professional conferences including AERA and ICLS. The editorial draws a parallel between the collaborative knowledge-building that CSCL promotes in classrooms and the collective knowledge building that the journal fosters within the field—positioning the journal as itself a CSCL artifact of the research community.
1(3): Focusing on participation in group meaning making
This brief editorial reports on the field's expanding international reach, noting that the Kaleidoscope network of European CSCL researchers has joined ISLS and that regional conferences in Europe, Asia, and North America are growing. It introduces the issue's central theme—participation in group meaning making—framing it as the theoretical core that can unify the diverse research strands within CSCL. The editorial proposes a research agenda centered on the discourse of collaborative groups and the methods by which participants jointly produce shared understanding.
1(4): Social practices of computer-supported collaborative learning
This editorial introduces the theme of social practices as central to CSCL. Drawing on situated learning theory, it argues that collaborative learning in computer-mediated settings demands that groups adopt effective patterns of interaction adapted to the affordances and deficits of the technology. The absent social cues of face-to-face interaction make the establishment of group social practices both more necessary and more difficult. Four articles in the issue are presented as studies of social practices across a variety of methods, illustrating the centrality of practice to both individual and group cognition.
2(1): Welcome to the future: ijCSCL volume 2
This editorial celebrates the journal's first full year of publication, noting nearly one hundred submissions, two hundred volunteer reviewers, and an Editorial Board of forty-two. It reflects on the maturation that journal publication signals relative to conference proceedings—demanding more formal presentation, more rigorous peer review, and more careful argumentation. The editorial frames the journal as a space for the community to build progressively refined, internationally reviewed knowledge, and reviews themes from the first volume including scripting, argumentation, and tools for collaborative learning.
2(2&3): A double issue for CSCL 2007
This double-issue editorial introduces the concept of "flash themes"— research topics that have flared up within the CSCL community between conferences—and presents papers on two such themes: scripting (structured sequences of collaborative activities) and argumentation (discourse designed to construct and evaluate claims). The editorial contextualizes both themes within ongoing debates about how computer support can best guide group interaction, and calls for journal submissions representing mature research agendas, significant theoretical innovations, and empirically grounded investigations of collaborative knowledge building.
2(4): CSCL and its flash themes
This editorial uses an extended metaphor of a tribal fire—and the dialectical relationship between individual burning logs and the emergent, enduring flame—to frame the CSCL debate about individual and group cognition. It introduces flash themes as a sustained editorial commitment: recurring topics such as scripting, argumentation, and tabletop interfaces that the journal will revisit across multiple issues. The metaphor illuminates competing methodological positions in CSCL research: measuring outcomes, analyzing processes in detail, or theorizing the dialectic itself.
3(1): The many levels of CSCL
This editorial focuses on the integration of multiple social levels in CSCL pedagogy and theory: the individual student, the small workgroup, and the classroom community. It introduces the SWISH principle (Split When Interaction Should Happen), proposing that effective pedagogical scripts must orchestrate transitions across levels—setting up group tasks at the class level, releasing groups to collaborate autonomously, then returning to individual and whole-class activities to consolidate what was built collaboratively. The editorial argues that integrating these levels is a central and often underestimated challenge for CSCL design.
3(2): The strength of the lone wolf
Using Kipling's verse on the dialectic of pack and wolf, this editorial frames the fundamental CSCL tension between individual and group. Drawing on Vygotsky's principle that distinctively human cognitive skills develop socially before being internalized individually, it poses the core CSCL design challenge: how can technology mediate the intersubjective-to- individual process of collaborative learning? The editorial surveys the issue's articles as investigations of how specific CSCL tools mediate the relationship between individual participants and their groups.
3(3): Explorations of participation in discourse
This editorial surveys the issue's articles as explorations of participation in collaborative discourse, engaging theories that define learning as increasing participation in specific discourses—from communities of practice to mathematical thinking as discursive participation. It introduces research on automated computational linguistics as a potential tool for supporting the labor-intensive analysis of discourse traces, while noting the fundamental role of context in discourse that limits fully automated approaches. The challenge of supporting shared context for cross-national student groups is also addressed.
3(4): CSCL practices
This editorial marks the completion of ijCSCL's third year, reporting fifty-eight peer-reviewed articles by researchers from twenty countries and an Editorial Board now numbering fifty-six members from twenty-one countries. It previews the forthcoming CSCL 2009 conference in Rhodes on the theme "CSCL Practices," emphasizing the field's growing concern with the specific educational and professional practices associated with collaborative learning technologies and with understanding how learning emerges at individual, group-cognition, and community levels.
4(1): Yes we can!
Written in November 2008 in the aftermath of the US presidential election and the global financial crisis, this editorial uses both events as occasions to articulate CSCL's social vision: that an educated, democratic citizenry and a more equitable global society require precisely the kind of collaborative, knowledge-building approach to learning that CSCL promotes. It argues that CSCL can provide the new vision, tools, and pedagogical approaches needed to go beyond testing and infrastructure, engaging students in constructing knowledge with peers across cultures and disciplines.
4(2): Practice perspectives in CSCL
This editorial frames the CSCL 2009 conference theme of "CSCL Practices" in terms of the broader "practice turn" in social theory—from explicit knowledge and social structures to embodied, materially mediated arrays of human activity organized around shared practical understanding. It traces the influence of situated learning and knowledge-building theory on CSCL's attention to practice, and argues that practice perspectives can be applied at individual, group, and community levels. The editorial calls for research that attends to how practices are enacted and transformed in CSCL settings.
4(3): Classical dialogs in CSCL
This editorial offers a vivid account of the CSCL 2009 conference in Rhodes, noting the historical resonance of meeting near the birthplace of Western philosophy while discussing the future of learning technology. It reflects on the field's growing maturity—its ability to hold pointed theoretical disagreements without denigrating alternative views—and reports on the journal's progress: seventy-five articles published, one hundred sixty-seven authors from twenty-one countries. The term "classical dialogs" gestures at the enduring theoretical tensions that animate CSCL, now conducted with Mediterranean clarity.
4(4): Paradigms of shared knowledge
This editorial introduces four paradigms for conceptualizing shared knowledge in collaborative settings: shared individual mental representations, distributed external representations, intersubjectively constructed meaning, and socially practiced knowledge. It argues that each CSCL study implicitly or explicitly adopts one of these paradigms, with significant consequences for how interventions are designed, how data are collected, and what counts as evidence of collaborative learning. The editorial presents the issue's articles on wikis, virtual reality, PowerPoint, and group-formation software as exemplifying each paradigm.
5(1): The CSCL field matures
This editorial announces ijCSCL's acceptance into the ISI Web of Science indices—including the Social Sciences Citation Index and Journal Citation Reports—marking a milestone in the field's academic legitimacy. It situates this development within the field's broader trajectory from the 1989 Maratea workshop through the establishment of ISLS as an international institution, and notes that the ISI indexing reflects the collective work of the Editorial Board, reviewers, authors, and readers who built the journal from scratch into a leading international venue.
5(2): A prism of CSCL research
This editorial presents the issue's papers as a prism—refracting the broad spectrum of current CSCL work across multiple disciplines, technologies, pedagogies, and methodologies. It emphasizes that CSCL must bridge computer science and learning science while remaining open to the full range of approaches through which each can contribute. The issue's articles investigate a cardiovascular simulation, epistemic games, and other technology-mediated collaborative learning environments, each privileging pedagogical aims and analyzing collaboration processes.
5(3): Guiding group cognition in CSCL
This editorial offers a theoretical diagram of the major influences on group cognition, placing at the center the sequential dialogical interaction through which individual voices are woven into collective meaning-making processes. It argues that supporting group cognition is rare, complex, and situation-specific, and that understanding it requires analyzing interactions at individual, group, and community levels. The editorial surveys articles addressing how group processes are guided, scaffolded, and measured, positioning the study of group cognition as the defining challenge of CSCL research.
5(4): Beyond folk theories of CSCL
This editorial critiques two inadequate modes of CSCL research: naive empiricism that imports folk theories of individual minds without reflection, and mechanical application of psychological or educational theories not developed for CSCL. It advocates for a third kind of research—theoretically self-conscious inquiry that investigates and refines theoretical perspectives specifically suited to the phenomena of computer-supported collaborative learning. The editorial calls for CSCL-specific theories grounded in the field's unique concern with intersubjective meaning making and group-level processes.
6(1): CSCL in Asia
This editorial uses the 2009 PISA results—in which Shanghai placed first in reading, science, and mathematics—as a starting point for examining CSCL's relationship to Asian educational systems. It challenges the assumption that Asian success reflects rote learning, citing evidence of curricular reform and creative problem solving in Shanghai schools, and asks what CSCL can offer regions whose educational cultures are rapidly modernizing. The editorial contextualizes growing Asian participation in the CSCL research community and the field's potential for global educational transformation.
6(2): Let a hundred flowers bloom; let a hundred schools of thought contend
This editorial—drawing on a classical Chinese poem—celebrates the productive diversity of theoretical, methodological, pedagogical, and ideological perspectives within CSCL. It argues that scientific revolutions require the confrontation of viewpoints and the critique of established paradigms, and that CSCL itself, by favoring collaborative and co-constructive knowledge building over received facts, enacts this openness. The editorial frames the journal as a venue explicitly committed to hosting multiple competing schools of thought rather than imposing a dominant orthodoxy.
6(3): Tweets from #cscl2011
Co-authored by the lead editor with Nancy Law and Friedrich Hesse, this editorial reports on the CSCL 2011 conference in Hong Kong—the first with large-scale Asian participation—where over four hundred registrants from more than thirty countries convened. It describes how tweets, blogs, video streaming, and other social media extended the conference's reach globally, while also noting the limitations of social media compared to genuine collaborative knowledge building. The conference's special theme— connecting CSCL to policy and practice—reflected the priority in many Asian countries for education policy to be informed by research.
6(4): Collaborating around the tabletop
This editorial develops the metaphor of collaborative discourse around a shared physical surface—from the family dinner table to the tribal fire to the interactive digital tabletop—as a way of theorizing how shared spaces enable joint meaning making. It connects the tabletop as a technological artifact to deeper questions about how proximity, shared orientation, and simultaneous access to a common workspace support intersubjective collaboration. The journal's flash theme of tabletop interfaces is introduced, with articles exploring gesture, gaze, and multi-touch interaction in small-group collaborative learning.
7(1): Ethnomethodologically informed
Dedicated to Harold Garfinkel following his death in 2011, this substantial editorial argues that the CSCL research field is becoming increasingly ethnomethodologically informed. It explains ethnomethodology's focus on the methods that members of a community use to establish and maintain intersubjective understanding, and argues for its particular relevance to CSCL's concern with joint meaning making. The editorial acknowledges tensions between ethnomethodology's resistance to theoretical framing and CSCL's design and educational agendas, while arguing that conversation analysis and video analysis derived from ethnomethodology are especially powerful tools for studying collaborative learning processes.
7(2): Cognizing mediating: Unpacking the entanglement of artifacts with collective minds
This editorial develops the concept of "cognizing mediating"—treating human cognition and technological mediation not as fixed nouns but as mutually shaping process verbs. Drawing on Hegel, Vygotsky, and activity theory, it argues that artifacts and minds are dialectically entangled: tools shape thought and thought reshapes tools. As digital technologies evolve at exponential speed, understanding how users adopt and adapt them becomes critical for CSCL design. The editorial calls for theory that can keep pace with the continuous co-evolution of collaborative learning technology and the cognitive practices it enables.
7(3): An international research community
Co-authored with Nancy Law and Friedrich Hesse, this editorial reports ijCSCL's ISI impact factor ranking—eleventh among two hundred three education journals, sixth among eighty-three information science journals—as evidence of the field's international standing. It notes that the journal receives submissions from fifty-three countries, reaches seven thousand universities through Springer, and has accumulated two million hits on its open-access website. The editorial presents the most frequently cited and downloaded articles as indicators of the themes dominating the field.
7(4): Traversing planes of learning
This editorial theorizes the connections among the three planes of analysis characteristic of CSCL: individual learning, small-group cognition, and community knowledge building. It argues that while all three planes are actualized in CSCL practice—typically in the sequence individual preparation, small-group work, whole-class sharing—group cognition tends to be treated as secondary to individual or community goals. Drawing on Vygotsky's foundational claim that intersubjective processes are primary, it calls for explicit empirical analysis and theoretical understanding of how the planes are connected, not merely assumed.
8(1): Learning across levels
This extended editorial introduces the theme of the CSCL 2013 conference— "learning across levels of space, time, and scale"—as a fundamental challenge for CSCL theory, analysis, and practice. It proposes that the levels of individual learning, group cognition, and community knowledge building may be connected by emergent interactional resources: artifacts, concepts, and practices that bridge local sequential interaction with larger socio-cultural contexts. The editorial surveys multiple theoretical frameworks for thinking about such connections—collaborative emergence, structuration theory, activity theory—and calls for empirical investigation of how resources mediate across levels.
8(2): Transactive discourse in CSCL
This editorial introduces the concept of transactivity—reasoning that builds on a previous utterance's reasoning—as a lens for exploring the multi-level character of collaborative discourse. It contrasts two ways of analyzing transactive sequences: reducing them to the mental states of individual participants, or treating them as group-level interactional achievements analyzable without reference to internal states. The editorial presents the issue's articles as investigations of how students from kindergarten to college build on each other's reasoning through shared computer media, and how such transactivity can be measured and supported.
8(3): Collaborative learning at CSCL 2013
Co-authored with Nancy Law and Friedrich Hesse, this editorial reports on the CSCL 2013 conference in Madison, Wisconsin, describing pre- conference workshops on interactional resources across levels of analysis and on cyber-infrastructure for design-based research. It highlights a workshop in which PISA's framework for measuring collaborative problem- solving skills was made public for the first time, noting its significance: if international standardized testing begins assessing collaborative skills, CSCL research will gain urgency for students, parents, teachers, and policymakers worldwide.
8(4): Reigniting CSCL flash themes
Co-authored with Nancy Law and Friedrich Hesse, this editorial returns to the journal's commitment to flash themes, reigniting ongoing discussions of argumentation, scripting, and tabletop interfaces while introducing a new theme: eye-tracking technology as a tool for studying and supporting collaborative joint attention. The editorial notes that research in these areas continues to raise fundamental theoretical and methodological controversies rather than merely refining established findings, and that joint attention—from infancy through adult collaboration—is foundational to intersubjective sense making in any CSCL setting.
9(1): Analyzing the multidimensional construction of knowledge in diverse contexts
Co-authored with Ulrike Cress, Nancy Law, and Sten Ludvigsen, this editorial presents articles spanning a wide range of contexts—from primary school knowledge-building forums to first-year college classes to Wikipedia—as explorations of the interrelationships among individual, small-group, and community learning. It foregrounds Activity Theory as a framework for analyzing the systemic contexts of CSCL practices, and develops the notion of interactional resources as bridges across levels of analysis, comparing their role to that of scaffolds, epistemic-game notes, and Wikipedia pivotal postings.
9(2): Dialogic foundations of CSCL
Co-authored with Ulrike Cress, Sten Ludvigsen, and Nancy Law, this substantial editorial traces the dialogical foundations of CSCL back to Vygotsky and Bakhtin, whose social, developmental, dialectical approaches to psychology and linguistics countered the individualism of Western philosophical tradition. Vygotsky demonstrated that higher cognitive faculties develop through social interaction before being internalized individually; Bakhtin showed that ideas emerge from multi-vocal discourse rather than self-contained minds. Together, their work provides CSCL with a theoretical vocabulary for analyzing how group discourse constitutes knowledge rather than merely transmitting it.
9(3): CSCL artifacts
Co-authored with Sten Ludvigsen, Nancy Law, and Ulrike Cress, this editorial surveys the multiple roles of artifacts in CSCL: as communication media, as structures for shared representation, as instructional scaffolds, as targets of collaborative co-construction, and as products of group knowledge building. It also notes that CSCL research is itself an artifact-producing practice—generating publications, data sets, and theoretical frameworks that constitute the evolving corpus of the field. The issue's articles both study artifact use in classrooms and mine the corpus of CSCL publications for indications of the field's development.
9(4): Analyzing roles of individuals in small-group collaboration processes
Co-authored with Nancy Law, Ulrike Cress, and Sten Ludvigsen, this editorial introduces the issue's articles as innovative approaches to analyzing individual roles within small-group collaboration, ranging from coding utterances of individual participants to characterizing group trajectories. It critiques the persistence of folk theories— naïve conceptions of fixed individual intelligence and knowledge transfer—that still pervade classroom practice and some CSCL research. The editorial argues that moving beyond folk theories requires methods sensitive to both the individual contributions and the group-level dynamics of collaborative learning.
10(1): From the editors: Collaboration and the formation of new knowledge artifacts
Co-authored with Sten Ludvigsen, Nancy Law, and Ulrike Cress, this editorial opens volume 10 by examining how knowledge artifacts—objects combining material and semiotic aspects—are formed through collaborative engagement. It argues that the interpenetration of conceptual structures and material anchors is at the heart of CSCL's mission, creating conditions for specific types of participant interaction. The editorial surveys multiple theoretical frameworks—cognitive, socio-cognitive, and socio-cultural—for conceptualizing artifacts, noting their convergence on the bidirectional interdependence of collaboration and the artifacts that structure it.
10(2): The core features of CSCL: Social situation, collaborative knowledge processes and their design
Co-authored with Ulrike Cress, Sten Ludvigsen, and Nancy Law, this editorial identifies the social situation of collaboration—including qualities of the group and characteristics of its members—as a key determinant of collaborative outcomes. It traces the evolution of research on computer-mediated communication from early deficit models (CMC as deprived of social cues) to current views recognizing that computer mediation can support rich collaborative interaction through appropriate design. Three core topics are foregrounded: social situation, collaborative knowledge processes, and the design of learning environments.
10(3): Conceptualizing the intersubjective group
This editorial proposes intersubjectivity as the defining characteristic of CSCL—not a state in which individuals hold similar beliefs, but a condition achieved through productive participation in joint meaning-making discourse. It argues that CSCL groups are not arbitrary gatherings but functional groups that have built shared understanding through interaction, and that collaborative learning in CSCL refers to increases in intersubjective knowledge at the group level, not to the sum of individual learning. The editorial positions this focus on the intersubjective group as what fundamentally differentiates CSCL from other learning sciences.
10(4): A decade of CSCL
This closing editorial surveys ten years of ijCSCL publication as a record of the field's progression from the post-cognitive paradigm revolution of the 1990s—with its expansion of the unit of cognition beyond the individual mind—through increasingly refined theoretical, methodological, and technological contributions. It charts the field's growing engagement with physical artifacts, interactional resources, dialogical approaches, and practice-oriented analysis, while noting that technology design and analysis methodology have been slower to adopt post-cognitive perspectives than theory has. The editorial calls for continued self-invention as CSCL faces new opportunities and challenges.